Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelaziz bin Khalifa Al Thani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 01:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Abdelaziz bin Khalifa Al Thani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person. Andy14and16 (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 21:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Members of the royal family of a nation, especially direct relations to the ruler are generally considered notable, per Wikipedia:Notability (royalty). But, regardless of that, I have added some other sources that confirm that he is (or was) the minister of Oil and Finance of Qatar, which is more than enough notability there. SilverserenC 21:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Although Wikipedia:Notability (royalty) is a failed proposal and is not in itself a reason to cite for keeping an article, the subject was indeed a minister in the Qatari government per the sources cited. --Darkwind (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources verify he was a government minister. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Well-referenced and satisfies the inclusion/ notability criteria IMHO. Scieberking (talk) 02:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep passes WP:POLITICIAN. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Click on the Google news link at the top of the AFD. The New York Times thinks he is notable. Plus the rulers of a country are notable. Dream Focus 23:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.