Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Switch Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Big Switch Networks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Big Switch Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in reliable sources which are independent of the subject to demonstrate WP:NCORP. The article is sourced entirely from press releases, the company's own website or industry press. There are a few mainstream press mentions, as you would expect with any company, but there's nothing featuring the company and certainly nothing which we could use to support notability. Ch1p the chop (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: As per nom, combined with the fact it's yet another corporate page that lays out the company's products presumably in the hope an interested buyer sees it. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Doesn't come close to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
• Weak keep as per sources provided, little OK. Mr-5 / (M ✉ / C🖋 ) 14:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete: An article combining an unreferenced product feature list with text and references summarising the company's investors, customers, and sponsorship of other projects, which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. I am not seeing the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate that it attained notability. (A summary merge to the company's purchaser Arista Networks might be an option.) AllyD (talk) 14:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.